FireStream 9250 vs Radeon PRO W9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon PRO W9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
Radeon PRO W9070 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon PRO W9070
+394%
4940
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
32
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
180W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Polaris 20
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
