FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R9 360 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon R9 360 OEM
+61%
1613
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Tobago
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
