GeForce 305M vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 305M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 305M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 305M
37
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+35008%
12990
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
4.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
36.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD107
N11M-LP1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
