GeForce 310M vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 25W)
Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
Arc A350M
+3504%
1766
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 300M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
RT Cores
6
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
