GeForce 310M vs Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (14W vs 30W)
Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
Radeon E4690 MXM
+683%
384
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 300M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV730
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1