GeForce 310M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 120W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+66614%
32690
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
76
16
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
120W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD103
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
