GeForce 315 OEM vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
8432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 315 OEM
45
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+97900%
44100
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
66
16
Shading Units
8448
8
TMUs
264
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
