GeForce 315 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 315 OEM
45
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+2673%
1248
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Lexa
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
