GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
22
Arc A750
+78081%
17200
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
DG2-512
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
