GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 475W)
Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
22
Radeon Pro Vega II
+63945%
14090
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Vega 20
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
