GeForce 940M vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 940M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (2115MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 940M
1124
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1055%
12990
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 940M
507
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1316%
7180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 940M
120
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3008%
3730
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
35.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
1124 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
35.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
AD107
N16S-GT1-KB-B
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
