Home Comparison GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Arc A310

GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
448
Arc A310 +500%
2688

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
46.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net