GeForce 9800 GT vs A30 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 165W)
A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT
336
A30 PCIe
+2971%
10320
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
56
112
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
165W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
GA100
G92-280-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
