GeForce 9800 GT vs Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT
336
Arc A310
+700%
2688
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 9800 GT
394
Arc A310
+676%
3061
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-280-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
