GeForce 9800 GT vs Radeon Pro V320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 230W)
Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT
336
Radeon Pro V320
+3099%
10750
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
230W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G92-280-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER
(215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
