GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 225W)
Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Arc A770
+9351%
19660
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 100
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
