GeForce GT 140 OEM vs FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
FirePro W600
+269%
768
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 100
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
