GeForce GT 140 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+1269%
2849
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 100
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
14
64
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
