GeForce GT 140 OEM vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 171W)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
+157%
536
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 100
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
27
64
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
