GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+500%
1248
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 100
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7