GeForce GT 430 vs Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
269
Arc A380
+1460%
4198
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 430
145
Arc A380
+2849%
4277
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 430
58
Arc A380
+3377%
2017
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
