GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 50W)
Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
269
Radeon Pro W6400
+1230%
3580
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 430
145
Radeon Pro W6400
+2385%
3604
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 430
58
Radeon Pro W6400
+2734%
1644
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Navi 24
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
