GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 106W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
451
Arc A350
+581%
3072
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
106W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
