GeForce GTX 1050 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2175MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050
1862
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+1335%
26730
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1050
1734
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+726%
14340
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1050
509
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+1217%
6708
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 10
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1354 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
48
640
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
AD104
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
