Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs FireStream 9170

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1708MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB +691%
3935
FireStream 9170
497

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1708 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

81.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
123.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
61.49 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
123.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
RV670
GP106-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net