GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1725MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+186%
12630
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
70
1280
Shading Units
4480
80
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GA100
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
