Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro S7150 x2

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 265W)
FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +33%
4416
FirePro S7150 x2
3297

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
265W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tonga
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net