Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro W2100

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 154% (1725MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +915%
4416
FirePro W2100
435
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1288%
4694
FirePro W2100
338

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
26W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Oland
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net