GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1272 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+21980%
4416
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
20
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT218
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
