GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce 9400 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+15127%
4416
GeForce 9400 GT
29
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1 GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G86S
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
