GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1618%
4416
GeForce GT 240
257
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1009%
4694
GeForce GT 240
423
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
12
1280
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
69W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT215
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
