GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GT 740
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (64W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+478%
4416
GeForce GT 740
763
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+809%
4694
GeForce GT 740
516
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1038%
2072
GeForce GT 740
182
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
762.6 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
64W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GK107
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-425-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
