GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1725MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+6%
4416
GeForce GTX 780
4156
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+68%
4694
GeForce GTX 780
2790
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+252%
596
GeForce GTX 780
169
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+5%
93
GeForce GTX 780
88
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
863 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GK110
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
