GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+115%
4416
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2048
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
