GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1725MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+317%
4416
NVS 810
1058
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+804%
4694
NVS 810
519
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
68W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GM107
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
