GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1725MHz vs 1683MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
P102 100 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
P102 100
+143%
10770
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4694
P102 100
+50%
7042
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2072
P102 100
+84%
3817
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
596
P102 100
+44%
859
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
93
P102 100
+97%
184
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
25
1280
Shading Units
3200
80
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GP102
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
