GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs P104 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
P104 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1733MHz vs 1725MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
P104 100
+50%
6655
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4694
P104 100
+15%
5439
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2072
P104 100
+31%
2718
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
596
P104 100
+17%
701
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
93
P104 100
+33%
124
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
15
1280
Shading Units
1920
80
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GP104
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
