GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1725MHz vs 1650MHz)
Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+4%
4416
Radeon Pro 5300
4224
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+2%
4694
Radeon Pro 5300
4558
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
85W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5