GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro W5500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 125W)
Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1855MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon Pro W5500
+18%
5224
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4694
Radeon Pro W5500
+2%
4798
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2072
Radeon Pro W5500
+11%
2317
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+20%
596
Radeon Pro W5500
495
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1744 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
125W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5