GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 255 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1725MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+363%
4416
Radeon R9 255 OEM
952
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
