Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon X1550 AGP

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon X1550 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 5.280GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1550 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 100W)

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
330 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.280GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
27W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV505
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net