GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon X800 GT AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 31.55GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Radeon X800 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
493 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
31.55GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.784 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.784 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
40W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
R420
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
R420 GT
(215RAACGA12F)
Turing
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-