GeForce GTX 1650 vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1770MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
A2
+51%
4531
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
10
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA107
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
