GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+7551%
2984
GeForce 210
39
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+1151%
3566
GeForce 210
285
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
