GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+321%
2984
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0