GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+176%
2984
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1078
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF100
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
