GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 575W)
GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2407MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
20864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
GeForce RTX 5090
+3412%
104800
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
GeForce RTX 5090
+1232%
47510
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
GeForce RTX 5090
+1508%
25825
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
2017 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
170
896
Shading Units
21760
56
TMUs
680
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
680
-
RT Cores
170
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1637 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
104.8 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.8 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.637 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
575W
250 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GB202
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GB202-300-A1
Turing
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
12.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
