GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+2884%
2984
NVS 310
100
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF119
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
