GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+91%
5728
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Ellesmere
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7