GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO V710
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 158W)
Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2000MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (28GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Radeon PRO V710
+826%
27650
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
224bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
54
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
3456
56
TMUs
216
32
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
54
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
158W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 32
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
